In hotel operations, technical issues are often seen as unavoidable. However, how a hotel approaches these incidents clearly reflects its operational management maturity. While maintenance was previously performed primarily when problems arose, this approach is now increasingly revealing its limitations.

family-travel-trend-boom-in-2018-34-548220250105082703.0746160

Guests don't see the technical systems behind the scenes, but they keenly feel the consequences through their stay experience. An unstable air conditioner, an interrupted hot water system, or an overloaded elevator during peak hours can all become "breaking points" in their journey. Therefore, the article "DECODING HOTEL PROCESS STRATEGY - PART 4: WHEN MAINTENANCE IS NO LONGER "REACTIVE" BUT AN OPERATIONAL ADVANTAGE" will delve into one of the fundamental yet often underestimated issues in hotel operational strategy.

When maintenance is still at the "troubleshooting" level

In many hotels today, especially independent hotels or projects that have not yet established a systematic asset management system, maintenance activities are still primarily reactive. This means that equipment, technical systems, and facilities are only inspected or intervened when a problem has already occurred, or when abnormal signs become clear enough to be undeniable. In the short term, this approach may seem cost-effective, but in the long term, it carries many operational risks. When maintenance is not viewed as a proactive process, hotels will always be "behind the problem," allowing every issue, no matter how small, to escalate into a negative customer experience.

network-system-management_(2)

Recent research data clearly shows the prevalence of this situation. According to JLL's 2024 report on hotel asset management in the Asia Pacific region, over 60% of maintenance costs in many hotels come from reactive repairs, rather than pre-planned preventive maintenance programs. This not only increases overall operating costs but also makes costs difficult to control as they often arise suddenly and urgently. At the same time, technical incidents that occur during a guest's stay, regardless of their severity, can disrupt the experience and directly affect satisfaction levels. In a context where customer experience is becoming a core competitive factor, dealing with problems only after they occur is no longer an optimal strategic choice. From an operational perspective, the lack of a standardised and consistently implemented preventive maintenance system often leaves the engineering department in a passive state, constantly "chasing problems" instead of proactively controlling risks. This not only reduces work efficiency but also affects inter-departmental coordination within the hotel. According to Deloitte's research, organisations that adopt a preventive maintenance model can reduce the number of technical incidents by up to 30%, while extending asset lifespan by 20% to 40%. However, in many hotels, especially in developing markets like Vietnam, the transition to this model is still slow due to a lack of data foundations, suitable management tools, and a clear long-term operational strategy. When maintenance is not integrated into the overall management mindset, it will continue to be seen as a support activity, rather than a crucial lever for optimising experience and business efficiency.

Reasons why maintenance remains reactive

  1. Short-term operational mindset and pressure for immediate cost optimisation

One of the deepest reasons why preventive maintenance models are not widely implemented lies in the perception of costs. In many hotels, especially during periods of cash flow optimisation or after market fluctuations, maintenance is often categorised as a postponable expense. Routine inspections, cyclical component replacements, or equipment condition assessments are often cut back or delayed to alleviate short-term financial pressure. However, this approach inadvertently increases long-term operational risks. According to research by the International Facility Management Association, emergency repair costs can be 2 to 4 times higher than scheduled routine maintenance costs. When maintenance is viewed as an expense rather than an investment in asset protection and experience, hotels will always be in a state of "saving now but paying later."

FPT-Polytechnic-HN-IT-1
  1. Lack of asset management foundation and technical data systems

A common reality in many hotels is that technical asset management remains manual or fragmented, not supported by specialised systems like CMMS. This means that information on equipment lifespan, repair history, failure frequency, or operational performance is not fully and consistently recorded. Without data, the engineering department has almost no basis for developing predictive maintenance plans, relying mainly on experience or reacting when problems have already occurred. According to PwC, businesses that apply asset management systems and data analytics can reduce maintenance costs by 20–25% and significantly improve operational efficiency. Conversely, without a data foundation, all maintenance decisions are reactive, allowing risks to accumulate over time without effective control.

  1. Maintenance processes are not standardised and systematised

In many hotels, maintenance activities still heavily depend on the individual capabilities and experience of the engineering team. Each engineer may have different approaches and processing standards, leading to inconsistency in work quality. Without a clear SOP system for each maintenance item, from routine inspections and risk assessments to incident handling procedures, quality control becomes difficult and reliant on human factors. This not only reduces operational efficiency but also makes it difficult for the organisation to scale or transfer capabilities when there are personnel changes. According to Deloitte, organisations with standardised maintenance processes can significantly reduce operational downtime and enhance the reliability of technical systems.

network_management_05_800ce4924d
  1. Lack of connection and coordination between operational departments

Another significant bottleneck lies in the disjointed flow of information between departments. In reality, many abnormal equipment signs are often first detected by front-line departments such as reception or housekeeping through guest feedback. However, without an effective mechanism for recording and relaying information, these signals can easily be overlooked or delayed. When the engineering department does not receive complete and timely data, the ability to detect and prevent issues early is significantly limited. According to McKinsey, organisations with high levels of inter-departmental coordination can improve operational efficiency by 20–30%, especially in areas related to customer experience. This demonstrates that maintenance cannot be the sole responsibility of one department but needs to be integrated into the hotel's entire operational ecosystem.

When reactive maintenance becomes a "hidden cost" of revenue

Maintaining a reactive maintenance model not only leads to internal operational shortcomings but also creates widespread consequences directly impacting customer experience, financial efficiency, and the hotel's long-term competitiveness. When maintenance is not considered part of a strategy but merely a troubleshooting activity, the entire operational system remains in a state of potential risk, where every minor issue can escalate into a "breaking point" in the customer journey.First and foremost, the most obvious impact is on customer experience, an increasingly central element of all business strategies in the hospitality industry. A technical issue, even a minor one like an unstable air conditioner or a malfunctioning water system, can disrupt a guest's emotions throughout their stay. It's worth noting that negative experiences tend to be remembered longer and spread more widely than positive ones. According to McKinsey research, over 70% of customers who encounter facility-related problems during their service use will not return. This indicates that each technical issue is not just an immediate operational problem but also a significant "opportunity cost" related to losing future customers.

What-do-guests-expect-when-staying-at-a-hotel-01

Furthermore, a reactive maintenance model also leads to a significant increase in operating costs, especially unexpected and difficult-to-control expenses. When equipment breaks down unexpectedly, the hotel not only has to pay for emergency repairs but may also have to replace the entire system in the event of a serious malfunction. According to a JLL report, reactive maintenance costs can be 3 to 5 times higher than preventive maintenance, due to factors such as emergency labour costs, replacement part costs, and operational disruption costs. Additionally, incidents occurring during peak periods can lead to direct revenue loss, when rooms cannot be utilised or customers demand compensation. From an asset management perspective, the lack of regular maintenance causes equipment and technical systems to wear out faster than their original design life. When signs of degradation are not detected and addressed promptly, the operational performance of the equipment gradually declines, leading to increased energy consumption and the risk of widespread failures. According to Deloitte, organisations that adopt preventive maintenance can extend asset lifespan by 20% to 40%, while significantly improving utilisation efficiency. Conversely, when maintenance only occurs after a breakdown, hotels not only face higher repair costs but also have to accelerate the replacement investment cycle, placing significant pressure on long-term budgets.

140

Finally, in an environment where consumer behaviour is increasingly linked to digital platforms, technical issues, if not handled effectively, can quickly become a reputational risk. Today's customers not only experience services but also share those experiences through online review channels. According to BrightLocal, 87% of consumers read online reviews before making a service decision. This means that negative feedback related to facilities, if not addressed promptly and skillfully, can influence the decisions of numerous potential customers. When such incidents recur and become a "common denominator" in reviews, the brand image will gradually erode, leading to a decline in market competitiveness.

From "reactive" to "predictive": Maintenance strategy in modern hotels

To transition from a reactive to a preventive maintenance model, hotels need to approach this issue as part of an overall operational strategy. First and foremost, establishing and standardising preventive maintenance procedures should be considered a core foundation in modern hotel operational strategy.Instead of performing maintenance in a fragmented or reactive manner, hotels need to adopt a systematic approach, where each piece of equipment and every technical item is monitored based on its lifecycle and actual usage frequency. This includes setting up periodic inspection standards, classifying the importance level of each system, and thereby building a detailed and prioritised maintenance schedule. When procedures are standardised, maintenance activities no longer depend on intuition or individual experience but become part of a measurable and controllable operational system. NewSun Hospitality's set-up and operational consulting services are developed with this orientation, helping hotels design predictive maintenance SOPs while ensuring a balance between operational efficiency and long-term cost optimisation.

1-what-is-a-process

Alongside process standardisation, the application of technology and data in maintenance management acts as a lever to enhance overall efficiency. Asset and maintenance management systems go beyond merely recording equipment status; they enable real-time data analysis to identify wear-and-tear trends, thereby forecasting potential risks before they escalate into failures. According to PwC, businesses that apply data analytics in maintenance operations can reduce maintenance costs by up to 25% and unplanned downtime by up to 70%. This demonstrates that maintenance, when supported by technology, is no longer a passive activity but a strategic tool for optimising asset performance and ensuring operational continuity. In addition to processes and technology, connectivity between operational departments also plays a crucial role in enhancing maintenance effectiveness. In reality, many anomalies in technical systems often stem from early customer feedback or observations from front-line departments such as reception or housekeeping. When this information is recorded and shared promptly with the engineering department, the hotel can intervene early and prevent issues before they occur. Conversely, without proper coordination mechanisms, these critical signals can easily be overlooked, allowing problems to accumulate and escalate at the most uncontrollable times. Therefore, effective maintenance is not solely the responsibility of the engineering department but the result of a closely integrated operational ecosystem across all departments.

SOJO-Hotels-4_1654236837

Finally, the human element remains central to every transformation strategy. To shift from a "fix-it-when-it's-broken" mindset to proactive asset management, engineering teams need to be equipped not only with technical skills but also with a modern operational mindset. This includes the ability to analyse data, assess risks, and understand the link between maintenance and guest experience. NewSun Hospitality's training programmes are designed comprehensively, helping engineering teams not only follow procedures correctly but also clearly recognise their role in ensuring service quality and contributing to brand value enhancement. When people, processes, and technology are synergistically connected, maintenance will no longer be a logistical activity but an integral part of the hotel's sustainable development strategy.

Conclusion: Maintenance is not just a cost, but a strategy

In an increasingly competitive hospitality industry, every operational element can become an advantage if leveraged correctly. Maintenance is no longer a supportive logistical activity but a crucial part of the experience and revenue strategy. By shifting from a reactive to a preventive mindset, hotels not only mitigate risks and costs but also create a stable operational foundation, contributing to sustainable service quality improvement. For hotels seeking a comprehensive solution to optimise operations and enhance business efficiency, NewSun Hospitality can partner as a strategic ally in building and implementing modern maintenance process systems.

References

  • JLL (2024). Hotel Asset Management Report Asia Pacific.
  • Deloitte (2024). Hospitality Operations and Asset Optimization.
  • McKinsey & Company (2024). Customer Experience in Hospitality.
  • PwC (2024). Predictive Maintenance and Operational Efficiency.