In the hospitality industry, standardisation was once considered the foundation for ensuring consistent service quality. However, as customer behaviour becomes increasingly diverse and experience expectations more personalised, excessive standardisation is now becoming a limitation. Customers are no longer seeking a "standardised" service, but an experience that is "tailored to them."

anh-6-16878596838902080641119

This is the challenging intersection between two seemingly complementary concepts: SOP and Personalisation. When SOPs are rigidly designed, they cease to be quality assurance tools and instead become a "limiting framework" that strips experiences of flexibility and emotion. The article "DECODING HOTEL PROCESS STRATEGY - PART 3: WHEN SOPS BECOME AN "INVISIBLE BARRIER" TO EXPERIENCE PERSONALISATION" will delve into this paradox, a significant bottleneck in the operational strategies of many hotels today.

When SOPs are effective but the guest experience lacks "personality"

In reality, most hotels, especially in the 4-5 star segment, have invested significantly in building SOP systems as a core foundation to ensure operational quality. Processes are meticulously standardised for each department and every touchpoint in the customer journey, aiming to minimise errors and create consistency in service experience. However, this very consistency, when not designed with sufficient flexibility, gradually creates a "uniform experience," where every guest is served according to the same script, regardless of who they are, where they come from, their past stay history, or their expectations. In a market where differentiation is increasingly difficult to achieve through tangible factors, an "over-standardised" experience is inadvertently diminishing the brand positioning capabilities of many high-end hotels.

48081-resort-phan-thiet-for-families

The gap between customers' personalisation expectations and businesses' ability to meet them is becoming increasingly apparent. According to Salesforce's 2025 State of the Connected Customer report, 73% of customers expect businesses to understand and respond to their individual needs, but only about 51% feel that this actually happens in practice. At the same time, over 65% of customers say they are willing to switch to another brand if the experience is not personalised. These figures highlight a significant paradox: businesses do not lack processes, but these processes are not "flexible" enough to adapt to the diversity of customer behaviour and expectations. In the hotel industry, where each stay is highly personal, this gap not only affects satisfaction levels but also directly impacts retention and customer lifetime value. At an operational level, applying a fixed SOP to every situation often leads to a "correct but insufficient" service state. A first-time guest might be satisfied with a standard process, but a returning guest will expect more in terms of recognition, subtlety, and personalised details. According to McKinsey research, businesses that effectively implement personalisation can increase revenue by 10% to 15% and significantly improve customer satisfaction. However, if SOPs do not allow staff to adjust flexibly, these opportunities cannot be leveraged. In such cases, even if staff identify customer needs, they are "limited" by the process, leading to missed crucial moments for creating memorable experiences.

sop-technology-application

Essentially, SOPs are built to ensure quality, but without flexibility, they can inadvertently "kill" the emotional element, which is core to the service industry. A check-in process that is technically accurate but lacks personalisation in the greeting, recognition, or interaction will struggle to create a deep impression. According to Harvard Business Review, emotional factors largely shape customer experience and have a stronger influence than functional factors in repeat decisions. This means that a "flawless" service is not necessarily a "memorable" one. Overall, it is clear that if SOPs are limited to a control function, they will struggle to meet the increasingly high demands of the market. In a context where experience is becoming a core competitive factor, SOPs need to be redefined as a flexible, adaptable system capable of "personalising" for each customer. Otherwise, the very processes built to enhance service quality will become invisible barriers, preventing hotels from creating differentiated value and building lasting relationships with customers.

Core Reasons Why SOPs Become Inflexible

  1. Process Design Prioritises Control Over Experience

In most hotels, especially those operating under traditional models or influenced by international management standards, SOPs are often built with the core objective of risk control, error minimisation, and ensuring consistency across the entire system. This was a reasonable approach when the service industry focused on uniform quality. However, in the current context, where customer experience has become a key competitive factor, overemphasising control inadvertently reduces the adaptability of processes. According to a 2024 PwC report, 73% of customers believe experience is a crucial factor in brand choice, yet many businesses still design operations around internal processes rather than the customer journey. When SOPs are built as a "safety barrier," they help avoid errors but also limit creativity and personalisation at each service touchpoint.

Design Thinking Process
  1. Lack of "Flexibility Margin" in SOP Structure

A common characteristic of many SOP systems is their linearity and closed nature, where each step is clearly defined with little room for adjustment. This turns SOPs into a "fixed script" rather than a "flexible operational framework." Meanwhile, hotel operations are constantly changing according to specific situations, customer segments, and contexts. According to Harvard Business Review research, service businesses with flexible processes have a customer retention rate approximately 30% higher than those operating with rigid processes. When SOPs are not designed with "open margins"—that is, spaces that allow staff to make adjustments within controlled parameters—every experience becomes "boxed in" and struggles to create differentiation. This is precisely why many hotels operate very precisely but lack a unique impression in the eyes of customers.

  1. Gaps in Empowering Frontline Staff

One crucial factor determining the ability to personalise experiences lies in the autonomy of frontline staff. However, in many hotels, even if SOPs allow a certain degree of flexibility, employees are often bound by unwritten rules or a fear of making mistakes. This leads them to prioritise "following the process correctly" over "meeting customer needs". According to Deloitte's research, organisations with a high degree of frontline staff empowerment can improve customer satisfaction by up to 20%, while also increasing the efficiency of real-time situation handling. When staff are not fully empowered, SOPs become a "safety limit", making it difficult for them to flexibly adjust services even when they clearly identify individual customer needs.

human-resources_6622aeb411a67
  1. Lack of Data Foundation to Enable Personalisation in Processes

In the data era, the ability to personalise no longer depends entirely on human perception but is strongly supported by information systems and technology. However, many hotels still do not effectively integrate customer data into their operational processes. Information about stay history, preferences, consumption behaviour, or customer lifetime value often exists disparately across systems, or is not utilised in actual service delivery. According to McKinsey, businesses that apply data to personalisation can increase customer satisfaction by 15% to 20% and improve revenue by 10% to 15%. When SOPs are not "activated" by data, all service decisions become generic, making it difficult for the experience to meet the individual expectations of each customer.

When SOPs are inflexible, both experience and revenue are limited.

If not adjusted in time, the rigidity of SOPs will create clear consequences for both customer experience and business performance. When SOPs operate rigidly and lack room for personalisation, the first and most noticeable consequence is that the customer experience becomes impersonal and fails to leave a lasting impression. In a market where accommodation products are increasingly similar in terms of facility quality and basic services, the differentiating factor is no longer "what is offered", but "how the experience feels". When every customer is served according to the same script, the experience becomes familiar, predictable, and lacks emotion. According to Deloitte's research, service businesses with effective personalisation capabilities can improve customer loyalty by up to 20%, while significantly increasing brand recall.

1698779468983

At the business level, the lack of personalisation in SOPs also directly affects the ability to optimise customer value and revenue strategy. When customers do not perceive a difference in their experience, they tend to make decisions based on more tangible and easily comparable factors such as room rates, location, or promotions. This forces hotels into price competition, increasing pressure on RevPAR and profit margins. According to a McKinsey report, businesses that effectively implement personalisation can increase revenue by 10% to 15% due to their ability to increase order value and optimise the experience. Conversely, when SOPs do not support personalisation, hotels will find it difficult to leverage these opportunities, thereby diminishing the effectiveness of their entire revenue strategy. A further, more long-term consequence is a decline in repeat rates and customer lifetime value. In the hotel industry, where the cost of acquiring new customers is always significantly higher than retaining existing ones, building sustainable customer relationships plays a crucial role. According to Bain & Company, just a 5% increase in customer retention can boost profits by 25% to 95%. However, this can only be achieved when customers perceive differentiation and personalised value in each experience. When SOPs do not allow this to happen, each stay becomes an independent experience, lacking connection and continuity, giving customers no incentive to return or remain loyal to the brand long-term.

profit

Finally, a consequence often overlooked but deeply impacting operational efficiency is the increased cost due to a lack of flexibility in handling situations. When processes do not allow for real-time adjustments, staff often have to "go around" to solve problems, or handle them rigidly, leading to additional errors. This results in rework, compensation, or even handling customer complaints, increasing costs in both time and resources. According to PwC, businesses with poor customer experience have 20% to 30% higher operating costs than those with good experiences, largely due to handling arising issues and process inefficiencies. When SOPs are not flexible enough to "get it right the first time", the organisation is forced to pay the price in "correction" costs throughout its operations.

From "Rigid" to "Flexible" SOPs: An Approach for Modern Hotels

To address this challenge, hotels need to redefine SOPs to be flexible and customer-centric, rather than solely focusing on internal control. To resolve the dilemma between standardisation and personalisation, SOPs must be redesigned with an entirely different mindset, transforming from a "closed" system into an "open" platform capable of adapting to various operational contexts. First, the "standard framework and flexible zone" model should be considered a core principle in modern process design. Here, the standard framework ensures core elements of service quality, from hygiene and safety standards to mandatory operational steps, while the flexible zone creates room for staff to adjust service delivery based on specific situations and customer segments. This is not merely a technical solution but a strategic approach that helps hotels maintain consistency without losing the emotional element in the guest experience. NewSun Hospitality's strategic consulting and operational model development solutions are built around this philosophy, where each SOP is not just an operational procedure but an "experience script" capable of flexible adaptation at every touchpoint in the customer journey.

Images

Alongside SOP restructuring, integrating customer data into operational processes acts as a "catalyst" for achieving personalisation at scale. When systems like CRM and PMS are effectively connected, SOPs no longer operate on a universal logic for all guests but are "activated" based on specific individual data. Information on stay history, preferences, consumption behaviour, or loyalty becomes the basis for staff to make appropriate adjustments in service delivery. According to McKinsey, businesses that apply data to personalisation can increase revenue by 10% to 15% and significantly improve customer satisfaction. In this context, SOPs are not just a set of execution steps but become an intelligent system capable of "understanding" and "reacting" to each specific guest. However, even the best-designed processes cannot be effective without the human element. Therefore, training and empowering frontline staff become one of the most crucial pillars in this transformation. When employees understand the objective behind each process and are empowered within clear boundaries, they can proactively adjust service delivery to suit each real-life situation. This not only shortens response times but also creates highly personalised experiences. According to Deloitte, service businesses with high levels of empowerment can improve customer satisfaction by up to 20%. NewSun Hospitality's training programmes are designed to develop a comprehensive service mindset, helping staff not only "follow the process correctly" but also understand how to "adapt to each customer," thereby sustainably enhancing the quality of the experience.

individual-engaging-digital-sop-standard-operating-procedures-interface-featuring-quality-assurance-workflow-315971477

Ultimately, for SOPs to truly be a supportive tool rather than a barrier, hotels need to build a service culture that puts customer experience at its core. In such an environment, flexibility and creativity are not seen as "deviations", but are encouraged within clear control frameworks. When an organisation shifts from a mindset of "absolute compliance" to "guided compliance", SOPs will no longer be a limitation, but a foundation for staff to develop their capabilities and create differentiated value. This is also a crucial step that helps hotels adapt to the increasingly strong trend of personalisation, while building a sustainable competitive advantage in the long term.

Conclusion: Personalisation is not at odds with standardisation

As the hospitality industry undergoes a significant shift towards experience-driven services, SOPs can no longer exist as static and rigid systems. Instead, they must be designed as flexible platforms where standardisation and personalisation coexist and complement each other. A good process is not one that makes every experience identical, but one that allows each experience to be relevant and memorable. This is the key for hotels to not only operate efficiently but also create distinctive value in the minds of their guests. For hotels seeking a systematic approach to restructure SOPs and enhance personalisation capabilities, NewSun Hospitality can serve as a strategic partner in this transformation journey.

References:

  • Salesforce (2025). State of the Connected Customer.
  • McKinsey & Company (2024). The Value of Personalization.
  • Deloitte (2024). Customer Experience in Hospitality.
  • Bain & Company (2023). Customer Loyalty and Profitability.
  • PwC (2024). Experience is Everything.